Human embryonic stem cell research – a marginal and yet unpleasant problem for Austrian (bio)politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15203/4103.vol53.2024Abstract
Research with embryonal stem cells (ESCs) is burdened by a socio-moral conflict, which implies equally the duty to protect human (embryonic) life and the duty to help sick people. In Austria, research with ESCs is not regulated by law. Because of their necessary destruction it is prohibited to use surplus ART-pre-embryos to generate ESCs. Contrary to this, the import of ESCs for research is allowed. Despite numerous regulatory requests of opponents and supporters of the ESCs-research these divergences were not subjected to any political agreement. The question is why politicians avoided to target this regulation. To clarify this attitude, I investigated statements on stem cell research of politicians that were submitted in the context of five outstanding events with the help of the Critical Discourse Analysis by the linguist Siegfried Jäger. The result was that most politicians from ÖVP, FPÖ, BZÖ rejected this research and avoid discussions by framing, blocking or suppressing. Politicians from the SPÖ negated such discussions, differently from the Greens. An important reason for all parties was the concern that latent political issues such as abortion, ART (because of surplus pre-embryos), etc. may trigger an up-to-date. Therefore, most involved politicians preferred non-decision making to keep the unregulated status quo.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Josef Hager
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
The OZP is the authorized quarterly publication of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)
The author of an article (in case of multiple authors: the corresponding author, responsible for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors) accepted to be published in the OZP hereby acknowledges the following Copyright Notice:
- The author retains the copyright to the article.
- It is the responsibility of the author, not of the OZP, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.
- Publication of a submitted text is dependent on positive results from the peer reviewing. In such a case, the OZP editors have the right to publish the text.
- In case of publication, the article will be assigned a DOI (digital object identifier) number.
- The author agrees to abide by an open access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY nc) license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article in any non-commercial way, so long as appropriate credit is given to the author and source of the work.
- The license ensures that the author’s article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. In order to facilitate distribution, the author agrees that the article, once published, will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the OZP.
- In addition, the author is encouraged to self-archive the article, once published, with reference to the place of the first publication.
- After the contribution appears in the OZP, it is still possible to publish it elsewhere with reference to the place of the first publication.
- The finished article, if published, will include a correspondence address (both postal and email) of the author.
- If written under the auspices of a grant from one or more funding agencies, such as FWF (Austrian Science Fund), ERC (European Research Council), and Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme), an article accepted for publication has to be deposited in an Open Access archive. The OZP’s archiving policy is compliant with these provisions. (In case the article derives on funding from a different source, the author is responsible to check compliance of provisions.)
