State, context and correspondence. Contours of a historical-materialist policy analysis

Autor/innen

  • Ulrich Brand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.129.vol42iss4

Schlagwörter:

Policy analysis, historical materialism, critical state theory, Gramscian hegemony theory, selectivities of the state, knowledge

Abstract

This paper outlines contours of a historical-materialist policy analysis through a double critique. First, historical-materialist approaches all too often conceptualize policies in a functionalist way as “outcomes” of predominant social relations, especially of class relations. The contingencies and own logics of policy processes are often downplayed. However, the (non-)correspondence between societal reproduction and policies needs to be conceptualized. It is proposed to understand the state as a “knowledge apparatus” which constantly organizes or even produces knowledge about objects of steering, societal and political problems, and the possibilities of how to deal with problems. Secondly, policy analysis has a simplified understanding of the state due to its state theoretical deficit. From a perspective of critical state and hegemony theory, the state is understood as a sectoralized social relation with power-shaped selectivities and is embedded in more or less hegemonic societal relations.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2013-12-18

Ausgabe

Bd. 42 Nr. 4 (2013): Offenes Heft

Rubrik

Forschungsartikel

Lizenz

The OZP is the authorized publication of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)

The author of an article (in case of multiple authors: the corresponding author, responsible for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors) accepted to be published in the OZP hereby acknowledges the following Copyright Notice:

  1. The author retains the copyright to the article.
  2. It is the responsibility of the author, not of the OZP, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.
  3. Publication of a submitted text is dependent on positive results from the peer reviewing. In such a case, the OZP editors have the right to publish the text.
  4. In case of publication, the article will be assigned a DOI (digital object identifier) number.
  5. The author agrees to abide by an open access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA) license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article under the same license, as long as appropriate credit is given to the author and source.
  6. The license ensures that the author’s article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. In order to facilitate distribution, the author agrees that the article, once published, will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the OZP.
  7. In addition, the author is encouraged to self-archive the article, once published, with reference to the place of the first publication.
  8. After the contribution appears in the OZP, it is still possible to publish it elsewhere with reference to the place of the first publication.
  9. The finished article, if published, will include a correspondence address (both postal and email) of the author.
  10. If written under the auspices of a grant from one or more funding agencies, such as FWF (Austrian Science Fund), ERC (European Research Council), and Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme), an article accepted for publication has to be deposited in an Open Access archive. The OZP’s archiving policy is compliant with these provisions. (In case the article derives on funding from a different source, the author is responsible to check compliance of provisions.)