The One and the Many: A Critical Reflection on the Foundations of Hans Kelsen’s Democratic Theory

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.3815.vol51iss3

Schlagwörter:

Monism, Pluralism, Relativism, Indeterminacy, Democracy, Epistemology

Abstract

This paper offers a critical examination of the foundations of Hans Kelsen’s democratic theory in neo-Kantian epistemology. It argues that, while such an epistemological framework provides coherence to his intellectual endeavor by reconciling his monistic legal theory with a pluralist democratic theory, it weakens the theoretical fertility and analytic edge of his political thought. Furthermore, I also claim that the Kelsenian epistemological turn, in its understanding of both law and politics, remains very much entangled in the dilemmas and modes of thought of a philosophical tradition that Kelsen himself believed to have entirely surpassed. His nevertheless insightful analysis of modern democratic institutions would therefore benefit from being read through different philosophical spectacles.

Autor/innen-Biografie

  • Pedro T. Magalhães, University of Helsinki

    Pedro T. Magalhães is a post-doctoral researcher at the Centre for European Studies in the University of Helsinki. He is the author of a monograph on The Legitimacy of Modern Democracy: A Study on the Political Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen, recently published by Routledge. He has published on political theory and the history of twentieth-century political thought in several periodicals, including Historical Social Research, the Journal of the History of Ideas and the Journal of Political Ideologies.       

Veröffentlicht

2022-09-30

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Forschungsartikel zum Schwerpunkt

Ähnliche Artikel

21-30 von 31

Sie können auch eine erweiterte Ähnlichkeitssuche starten für diesen Artikel nutzen.