Deportation and the liberal-democratic paradox: Margins of discretion in decisions to expel reflected asylum seekers

Authors

  • Judith Welz Universität Wien
  • Jakob Winkler Universität Wien (bis Mai 2013)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.162.vol43iss2

Keywords:

expulsion, deportation, asylum procedures, liberal-democratic paradoxon, right to private and family life, discretion

Abstract

Deportations as well as the preceding expulsion procedures take place within the so called liberal-democratic paradox, which refers to the tension between national interests and universal human rights. The article addresses this tension by empirically studying the weighing of public interests against the right to private and family life in 58 expulsion orders issued between 2011 and 2013. The study shows that, in the analyzed decisions, significant margins of discretion arise from these two undefined law concepts and that authorities tend to prioritize national interests over human rights. Finally, the article illustrates how the liberal-democratic paradox is being dissolved in praxis by the specific practices of bureaucrats and judges.

Author Biographies

  • Judith Welz, Universität Wien
    Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Politikwissenschaft
  • Jakob Winkler, Universität Wien (bis Mai 2013)

    Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Politikwissenschaft

Downloads

Published

2014-04-01

Issue

Section

Special issue article

Similar Articles

61-70 of 329

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.