Member states’ opposition in the Council of the European Union and its impacts on the implementation of directives

Authors

  • Brigitte Pircher Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Political Science Linnaeus University 351 95 Växjö Sweden Phone: +46 470 70 8163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.1896.vol46iss3

Keywords:

European Union, Council of the EU, oppositional voting behaviour, Austria, implementation of directives, legal misfit

Abstract

In the Council of the European Union (EU), a qualified majority is mostly required to adopt legislative acts. Based on this majority rule, individual member states can be outvoted and are subsequently obliged to implement the law. This article analyses whether opposition in the Council of the EU affects the transposition of directives into national law by using the example of Austria from 2000 to 2008. The results demonstrate that domestic factors, rather than a negative political attitude, were responsible for delays and procedures when implementing previously contested directives. However, the effects of opposition in the Council on implementation were particularly apparent in cases where there was a high degree of misfit between EU provisions and the domestic legal structure.

Author Biography

  • Brigitte Pircher, Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Political Science Linnaeus University 351 95 Växjö Sweden Phone: +46 470 70 8163

    Ich arbeite derzeit als postdoctoral researcher an der Linnaeus-Universität am Institut fuer Politikwissenschaft in Växjö, Schweden. Davor war ich u.a. als externe Lehrbeauftragte und als Kommunikations- und Publikationsassistentin am Institut fuer europäische Integrationsforschung der Universität Wien beschäftigt.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-24

Issue

Section

Research Article

Similar Articles

181-190 of 257

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.