Demokratische Partizipation durch Expertengremien? Der Trade-Off zwischen Inklusion und Effektivität

Authors

  • Eva Krick Humboldt Universität Berlin Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin 0049 30 2093 1431

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.122.vol43iss1

Keywords:

Partizipation, Expertengremien, Beteiligungsforschung, Verhandlungstheorie, demokratische Legitimation, Deutschland

Abstract

Können Expertengremien zur Bürgerbeteiligung beitragen? Der Beitrag behandelt diese Frage nach dem Partizipationspotential von Expertengremien auf der Grundlage eines empirischen Fallvergleichs plural zusammengesetzter und mit der Politikformulierung betrauter Beratungsgremien der deutschen Bundesregierung. Maßstab der Analyse ist ein zweidimensionales Partizipationskonzept, welches aus der empirischen und theoretischen Beteiligungsforschung hergeleitet wird und sowohl die Gleichheit der Partizipation, als auch die Wirksamkeit einbezieht. Es werden zwei Typen von Expertengremien kontrastiert, die jeweils eine der Partizipationsdimensionen auf Kosten der anderen erfüllen. Die verschiedenen Partizipationsniveaus werden verhandlungstheoretisch erklärt.

Author Biography

  • Eva Krick, Humboldt Universität Berlin Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin 0049 30 2093 1431
    Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin, Postdoc

Downloads

Published

2014-03-10

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 1 (2014): Ökologische Krise

Section

Research Article

License

The OZP is the authorized quarterly publication of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)

The author of an article (in case of multiple authors: the corresponding author, responsible for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors) accepted to be published in the OZP hereby acknowledges the following Copyright Notice:

  1. The author retains the copyright to the article.
  2. It is the responsibility of the author, not of the OZP, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.
  3. Publication of a submitted text is dependent on positive results from the peer reviewing. In such a case, the OZP editors have the right to publish the text.
  4. In case of publication, the article will be assigned a DOI (digital object identifier) number.
  5. The author agrees to abide by an open access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY nc) license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article in any non-commercial way, so long as appropriate credit is given to the author and source of the work. 
  6. The license ensures that the author’s article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. In order to facilitate distribution, the author agrees that the article, once published, will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the OZP.
  7. In addition, the author is encouraged to self-archive the article, once published, with reference to the place of the first publication.
  8. After the contribution appears in the OZP, it is still possible to publish it elsewhere with reference to the place of the first publication.
  9. The finished article, if published, will include a correspondence address (both postal and email) of the author.
  10. If written under the auspices of a grant from one or more funding agencies, such as FWF (Austrian Science Fund), ERC (European Research Council), and Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme), an article accepted for publication has to be deposited in an Open Access archive. The OZP’s archiving policy is compliant with these provisions. (In case the article derives on funding from a different source, the author is responsible to check compliance of provisions.)